Operating \t\t\tsystem<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n
Microsoft<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n
MAC<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n
GNU \t\t\tLinux<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n How \t\t\tit works?<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Low \t\t\tcustomization, no possibility of self improvement \u2013 only \t\t\tprofessionals can adjust.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n No \t\t\tneed to adjust, what you get is what works, if something stops \t\t\tworking, get a new one.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Highly \t\t\tcustomizing \u2013 everyone can improve, community based.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Stratification<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Consumers, \t\t\tgamers, incognizant users…<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Young \t\t\turban professionals.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Autonomists, \t\t\tanarchists, geeks, enthusiasts.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n What \t\t\tis it based on?<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Profit<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Style<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Humanism<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Ownership<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Proprietary<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Proprietary<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Open \t\t\tsource<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Orientation<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Hard-core \t\t\tneoliberal market.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Upper-class \t\t\tmarket of aesthetics.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Exchange \t\t\tmarkets.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n What \t\t\tis the relationship?<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Monopolistic<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Elitist<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n From \t\t\tmany to many<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Work \t\t\tand labour<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Classical \t\t\tcapitalist exploitation system. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Exploitation \t\t\tbased on ideology of style.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Sharing \t\t\twork flow, gift economy, high precarious element. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Sustainability<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Depending \t\t\ton huge advertising machine, monopolistic and unsustainable.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Depends \t\t\thighly on amount of people using it \u2013 small amount of \t\t\tprofessionals make it sustainable.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Sustainable \t\t\ton many levels: adoptable, recyclable, high level of customization \t\t\tand localization.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Waste \t\t\tand recycling<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Large \t\t\tamounts of e-waste created by advertising stronger, newer and \t\t\tbetter equipment cyclically. Old equipment is not recycled.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Smaller \t\t\tamount of waste due to longer life span. Motto is \u201cfuturists \t\t\tdon’t look back\u201d, so there is no recycling involved.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Opens \t\t\tup awareness and according actions to possibilities of recycling \t\t\tand reusing: software for older machines, less resources needed.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Analogy \t\t\tto art system<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Profit \t\t\tbased art system concerned with traditional gallery\/museum model \t\t\twith pseudo-development.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Elitist, \t\t\taesthetics regarded as \u201csomething beautiful\u201d system, where \t\t\thighly professional independent actors run art system based on \t\t\tnovelty.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Always \t\t\tchanging, concerned with medium as much as with message, \t\t\tsustainable, localized, exchange makes it work, collaborative, \t\t\talways work in progress.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n \n \n <\/p>\n Diagram shows art operating system with working in autonomy and dependant one in reference to computer operating systems.<\/p>\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/farm5.static.flickr.com\/4081\/4802244808_046a0d5d83_b.jpg\")
<\/dt>\n